Welcome to Ratepayers Victoria Incorporated, advocating for Collaboration, Accountability & Transparency. Our 2022 vision is a future where Victorian ratepayers are highly connected, value adding and engaging to increase their councils’ and state agencies’ propensity to achieve higher council rates affordability and local liveability. Our blog highlights the latest news and issues affecting ratepayers. Visit our Facebook.
Ratepayers Victoria, Inc. (A0040924M)
Membership Application/Renewal: 1/7/2017 to 30/6/2018
Name (of organization if relevant)______________________________________
Address _________________________________ _____________________________
Phone_________________________ Mobile _______________________
In the event of my admission to membership, I agree to be bound by the rules of the Association
for the time being in force, to pay annual membership dues as determined by the association,
and to work cooperatively with the other members.
Signature: ________________________ Date______________
Enclosed: $ _______________________
Membership Fees: $10 Pensioners: $20 Individuals: $40 Organization
Additional donation optional $_____________________
Cheque/Money Order /Cash or
Bank deposit to : Ratepayers Victoria Inc.
BSB: 063855 Account No: 10127765
Ratepayers Vic Inc.
8/1248 North Road; Oakleigh South 3167
Email: RatepayersVic@outlook.com Phone : 03 9570 6227
Council clowns are a costly joke
Victorian councils criticised for social and political meddling
JOHN MASANAUSKAS and JESSE WRAY-MCCANN, Herald Sun
LOCAL councils are under fire for meddling in controversial issues like flying political flags, promoting indigenous treaties and raising century-old ethnic disputes.
Councillors have been told to stick to basics like collecting rubbish and fixing roads instead of focusing on social and political matters outside their jurisdictions.
MINISTER TELLS COUNCIL TO FLY RAINBOW FLAG
The City of Monash is divided over a bid by some councillors to discuss ways of recognising the Armenian genocide which occurred a century ago.
Monash Mayor Rebecca Paterson took the extraordinary step of issuing a statement accusing the councillors of stoking unnecessary controversy by pitting one ethnic group against another.
This matter may be appropriate to be debated in the Australian Parliament, but it is not appropriate for our council chamber,” she said.
However, one of the councillors, Josh Fergeus, said the debate “remains a live issue” for the council that will require detailed consultations with the community
YARRA’S VIETNAM FLAG STOUSH
City of Yarra councillors have voted to temporarily fly the so-called Co Vang flag, which is a Vietnamese community symbol linked to the South Vietnamese regimen which was defeated by the Communist forces in 1975.
State Vietnamese Community president Vivien Nguyen said the flag represented the identity and heritage of the community and its refugee background.
“We are proud of our heritage, we are proud of our identity and we want to show the broader community as a contribution to overall multiculturalism in our society,” she said.
But Evan Mulholland of free market think tank the Institute of Public Affairs, said voters elect councillors to focus on fixing local roads and collecting their rubbish.
“Councillors have no jurisdiction to comment on international affairs, refugees, or marriage.
“They should do that in their own time as private citizens rather than spending our money,” he said.
Meanwhile, Moreland Council is tomorrow due to debate a motion by Socialist Alliance councillor Sue Bolton to organise a “major public forum” to discuss a treaty with local Aborigines.
However, a council officer’s comments on the idea said the State Government was handling treaty negotiations with indigenous groups.
“At this stage it is uncertain what role local government has to negotiate such a treaty,” the officer said.
The officer said that depending on how large and formal the forum was it could cost up to $5000 including money spent on external speakers, catering, sound and lighting.
Among other issues, many councils fly pro-LGBTI community flags, put up ”welcome refugees” banners and spend ratepayers’ funds on providing aid to local governments in East Timor.
Ratepayers Victoria Inc.
Dear Mayors of Local Councils of Victoria. Local government Minister Natalia Hutchins and Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews
Ratepayers Victoria committee member Frank Sullivan and myself were recently invited to meet Nillumbik Mayor, Peter Clarke to discuss local government issues.
Peter was appointed Mayor of Nillumbik Council last October after council elections.
Peter’s first duty was to investigate the present running of his council.
He decided to dispose of the Mayoral car and with additional savings of registration and insurance this resulted in a saving of approx. $ 50.000 over four years
The mayor also reduced his Mayoralty remuneration by 10%
He decided with the support of his fellow councilors that a new Chief Executive Officer was to be appointed
The first major duty of the new CEO was to remove the present four senior directors and that no more than 57% of incoming revenue would be used on salaries.
Cr. Clarke stated that this would lead to realignment of staff with fewer managers and more staff on the ground .The council also froze salaries and decided that there will be no rate increase next financial year.
Another massive saving was the slashing of advertising in the local newspaper that promoted the Mayor.
The State Government will introduce revaluations every year .This will cost council’s 41 Million annually with no financial benefit to councils .This decision will affect every council in Victoria.
Cr. Clarke made an excellent comment in that council decided to do an audit on surplus council land in Nillumbik and with the sale of this land resulted in $25 million for their council.
Ratepayers Victoria ask that if Nillumbik Council can make savings as such, why cannot your council make these savings also.
At the meeting on the 19th May 2017 with Cr. Clarke he stated that Ratepayers Victoria should engage with the Municipal Association of Victoria.
He said that there has been a very significant change at the MAV and considers now is the time for RPV to communicate with them.
RPV are aware that in an article in the Herald Sun on the 9th March 2015, the Andrews Government said they may review the role on the MAV. At present RPV is not aware of any significant change at the MAV.
RPV consider that with rate capping with us, now is the time for councils to act as Nillumbik council has .If councils are not prepared to address the financial problems at councils such as addressing the spending RPV consider that now is the time for the Government to consider reverting to AMMINISTRATORS to be appointed at our councils.
All the fact re land tax go to www.sro.vic.gov.au/valuation
Heraldsun 9/5/17 Mayor Challenges peers by Ian Royall
The Mayor of an outer Melbourne council that is freezing residents rates next year, says his counterparts aren’t doing enough to cut costs.
Nillumbik is set to be the only Victorian Council to put a hold on rates next year,
Defying many who will push for rises of up to 2 per cent.
Mayor Peter Clarke claimed other councils were automatically putting up their rates by 2 per cent – The current state government limit.
No Victorian Council froze rate bills in this current year.
As the state’s 79 Councils finalise their draft budgets for the next financial year.to an extended August31 deadline,Cr Clarke said local governments had to be “smarter”
the former Melbourne city councillor reduced his own income,sold the mayoral car and slashed advertising that promoted the mayor.
those three measures saved more than $100,000. Its not that hard to start finding the money, he said.
The council froze salaries and made four senior directors redundant last week
Cr Clarke said the exits were a realignment of staff” which meant fewer managers and more staff on the ground.
look at every line item in detail. I don’t think people are ding that.
” They look at what they did last year and then add more to it” he said ” I haven’t spoken to another mayor at another council who has said they’ve had a serious shot at not putting their rates up. They automatically went for the cap and said, “Why wouldn’t you do it.
Cr Clarke said he knew he was out of step with his counterparts across the state.
Our focus is what our ratepayers are telling us,not how much you can spend,he said. “Its about getting better services for the same dollar,” He said Nillumbik had a four year plan to retire debt to save an $800,000 annual interest bill, but no services would be cut. Municipal Association of Victoria chief executive Rob Spence said Cr Clarke did not understand other councils’problems, especially those in country areas with small populations and low rates revenue.
‘They are having to stop doing things because they don’t have enough money.” he said. Mr Spence said councils in growth areas were trying to cope with booming populations.
“Wyndham has 80 babies born a week.
The growth is massive and the council is struggling to keep up with the infrastructure requirements such as maternal and child health facilities.
So you can’t tarnish everyone with the same view”
Comments to Jack_d@iinet.net.au
or phone 0412238974
Mayoral car stating that if he was to take use of the Mayoral car he would have to place his car in storage for the term of his Mayoralty. This resulted in an income from the sale of the Mayoral car with additional savings of registration and insurance over 4 years to be estimated at approximately $50,000 savings to Council.
He also reduced his Mayoralty remuneration by 10%.
A major step was to remove the CEO and appoint a replacement which resulted in the removal of four Senior Directors. Cr. Clarke stated that this led to realignment of staff which meant fewer Managers and more staff on the ground. Nillumbik Council froze salaries and will have no rate increase in the next financial year.
Another massive saving was the slashing of 1/4 page advert advertisement in the local newspaper which promoted the Mayor and was very expensive.
Cr. Clarke stated that most Council’s look at what they did last year and then added more to it. He said that he had spoken to another Mayor who said they automatically went for the 2% rate capping and said why wouldn’t you do it!
The State government will introduce revaluation every year and this will cost Council’s $41 million annually with no finical benefit to local governments. It is a State Government means of increasing their slice of the pie.
If Nillumbik Council can make savings for the Ratepayers why cannot other Councils.
Finally Cr. Clarke stated that he discovered that Nillumbik Council had $41 million in surplus land holdings and the sale of these assets could be used to upgrade existing facilities.
Ratepayers Victoria congratulate Cr. Clarke (Mayor of Nillumbik) as he is listening to his Ratepayers. All other Mayors should follow his example.
Ratepayers Victoria Inc.>
On the 4 March 2017, we hosted our first 2017 community education forum to better understand:
- The role of the Local Government Inspectorate in the Victorian Public sector’s Integrity System for Public, presented by David Wolf
- ESC Revised Rate Capping Guidance 2017-18, presented by Andrew Chow.
We recorded these presentations and will upload the videos on this website and Facebook, when they are available.
Local Government Investigations & Compliance Inspectorate (LGICI)
The LG Inspectorate has been in operation since 2009 and with the return of Chief Municipal Inspector David Wolf in July 2016, has been cementing its position as the lead integrity agency for local government in Victoria.
David’s presentation helped to clarity the responsibility and key function of the Local Government Inspectorate, which is to investigate concerns related to council operations including criminal or corruption offences involving councillors, senior council officers or any person subject to the conflict of interest provisions. It is not just about any violations of the LG Act by Councillors, as many of us incorrectly thought so.
If you have complaints about council operations and breaches of the Local Government Act 1989, which relates to the following and leads to potential criminal offenses:
- corruption incidents
- misuse of position
- conflict of interest
- disclosure of confidential information
- distribution of unauthorised electoral material
then go to the LGICI’s complaint reporting guidelines, available on its webpage.
The best way to submit a complaint is to complete an online form – click here to access it. The agency is keen to address ratepayers’ complaints and will advise incident reporters of follow-up evaluation decisions and actions.
Essential Service Commission (ESC)’s Revised Rate Capping Guidance 2017-18:
ESC Andrew Chow presented the Revised Rate Capping Guidance 2017-218 resources as he did to councils, to ratepayers.
There is a role for ratepayers to evaluate how well their councils comply with the Community Engagement Guidance, which requires councils to inform their communities not just tokenism information about their proposed higher rate caps, but also
- the reasons for which the higher cap is sought
- how the views of the ratepayers and community have been taken into account
- how the higher cap is an efficient use of council resources and represents value for money
- what consideration has been given to reprioritising proposed expenditures and pursuing alternative funding options and why those funding options are not adequate
- the application’s consistency with the council’s long-term strategy and financial management policies.
These business case information must be disclosed to communities. Communities have an oversight role to check the community engagement compliance requirements are adequately met. If they know councils are eluding this compliance obligation, they should inform the ESC before or at the time their councils submit in their rates variation. ESC has a short time-frame to evaluate all councils’ applications and there may be insufficient time to address community feedback received late.
Ratepayers are already aware that some councils, such as Monash Council, are manipulating community engagement and making multi-million and biased and closed meetings’ project decisions now that will impact future rate levels in 3 or more years later. While some councils may elude informing their constituents of the future and longer term rate burden impacts of their larger project decisions now, little do they know that ratepayers can read & evaluate their councils’ 4 years forecasts of statutory financial ratios to understand whether future rate burdens prevail with their current large project intentions.
The Rates Capping policy require councils to consider long term forecasts in budget planning. However there is a loophole in the LG Act – some councils can be elusive in disclosing budget scenarios and long term forecasts publicly, because LG Act does not explicitly require them to do so. Reporting such elusiveness to the ESC now, will be considered when ESC evaluates these councils’ rate variation applications in the future.
It can happen
In mid 2016, Ratepayers Victoria (RV) were approached by a local newspaper in Darebin to help attract the right type of community caring people to run in the then coming local council election in October 2016
RV, lead by committee member Frank Sullivan, facilitated a public meeting in Northcote, to see if RV could attract new candidates to stand at the forthcoming election and also to get a local ratepayer group formed .”
A local ratepayer, Anne Laver attended the public meeting and agreed to form a local group. Frank helped Anne to setup the group, including helping to interview several local candidates and assess their capacity to support RV values and principles; and endorsed six candidates as a result. Five of the six endorsed candidates got elected, of who four were women. Recent feedback says these new councilors are doing an excellent job.
The Darebin Ratepayers group recently held a meeting with their councilors (five attended) and local residents/ratepayers (10 attended) to discuss current and emerging issues. Frank attended this meeting, reporting that “it was just brilliant to hear reasons from councilors regarding issues and comments from the ratepayer. There were some great suggestions put forward by the ratepayers to improve the system.”
Frank message to all “You cannot beat communication. Yes ,it can happen!”
Base on the success case development achieved by Frank, RV will be be encouraging ratepayers without a local representation to start forming their local groups. Please contact Frank Sullivan, who is project manager of RV’s New Ratepayers Group Development project – direct email: firstname.lastname@example.org (or email@example.com) for assistance in setting up your local ratepayer group.
Today, we received a letter from Minister Hutchins, informing ratepayers the progress status of the reform planning milestones to date.
Last year, we organised a forum in the Knox club, to provide feedback to a discussion paper proposing reform directions and ideas. We understand that a first version (or draft) of the proposed new legislation will be released sometime this year, open to a last open review before completing a final version for Parliamentary review and approval voting. The letter we received today is in response to the summary list we submitted to the Reform team in early January 2017.
- Effective compliance to the Act: Without an effective policing system, non compliance , as is today, will continue business as usual where there are lacking effective penalties to no consequences for non compliance offences. As a component of a future policing system, we also recommend adopting citizen juries, to help oversee and report governance and compliance at local levels. The Minister can nominate and provide training & support for qualified ratepayers to be part of their council’s citizen jury team. Ratepayers Victoria can help implement and manage this new community driven component of governance and compliance management
- Rate Valuation Equity: As seen in the latest Parliament Rate Capping report, councils and opposition parties are not supporting rates capping and they continuously steer towards blaming the Fair Go Rates policy for escalating and above CPI individual rate rises. The real cause is CIV and the ineffective use of existing rating tools by councils. We recommend moving away from adopting CIV towards adopting a modified SIV as common state-wide rate revaluation method. SIV ensures investment developers can no longer benefit the most from a CIV approach and more importantly gives some protection for our older ratepayers from excessive rate rises caused by CIV.
- Standard chart of accounts (prescriptive): essential for increasing financial accountability and sustainability across all service and operational dimensions of municipal businesses. This chart of account also has to integrate a common service classification system and the LGPRF to streamline lifecycle and performance management of the many hundreds of individual municipal services claimed by councils.
- A uniform complaint management Registry system across all councils that allows all stakeholders, especially ratepayers to track and manage the resolution status and satisfaction measures of registered complaint processing from capture to resolution. The analytics reporting will give evidence and insights into the strengths and weaknesses of councils’ capacities and self improvement propensities to service their communities, including their performance in good governance conduct and decision making.
- Community Engagement: Adopt a state common standard in public participation, such as the IAP2, which can provide the standard framework dimensions for justifying council’s choice of community engagement levels and reporting their performance measures in community engagement.
- Confidentiality and Conflict of interest: Distinct state-wide definitions of meeting confidentiality and conflict of interest (CoI) declarations (including compliance & offence rules) need to be specific, to return integrity of council’s decision making information transparency and justification accountability.
- Decision making Transparency & “Best Value” accountability: Simply making up and availing information for decision making, through officers reports or on the go council meeting debates is not sufficient to achieve transparency. Mandate guidelines for better and decision making information to be more relevant and publically accessible, timely and accurate and complete. We recommend decision making publications to be proactive and provide clarity of procedural and information criteria that explain (a) how decisions are to be made, justified and risk assessed and (b) organisational project management procedures and measures to ensure and report traceable and progressing implementation accountability.
- Term limits on CEO and councillors (2 terms), to mitigate groupthink, incompetent and politically biased councillors and CEOs to service local communities. We also recommend performance appraisals, supported by clear performance measures, to be adopted and published , to motivate CEO, Mayors and Councillors to be more accountable to their communities and demonstrate their capacities to achieve goals, linked to their performance measures and Below are a list of reform priorities ratepayers would like to see included in the scope of LG reforms.Councillors’
- Competency Assurance: It is common knowledge that lacking councillors’ competencies in leadership, governance and interpersonal skills are some of the key factors that are fostering poor council cultures, biased and poor decision making, incompetency, mistrust and poor relationships with their communities. Regular and progressive training can be mandated, especially for long standing councillors, to build / correct councillors’ competencies in leadership, corporate governance and people relationship management.
Councils who wish to increase next financial year’s rates will need to ensure they inform their community of their business case for raising rates above the cap.
The Essential Service Commission (ESC) has issued guidelines to help councils engage effectively with their communities, to ensure they provide top quality information, to ensure their communities become well informed of their councils’ decisions to increase rates above the cap.
The guidelines are available online for the public to view and understand the evaluation criteria ESC would use to assess whether councils have genuinely engaged with their communities. Ratepayers can assist to evaluate if their councils have followed these guidlines properly. If their councils have not, ratepayer advocates can provide the factual evidence to justify the non compliance and share with Ratepayers Vic to quality assure and facilitate forwarding community concerns to the ESC. They should also discuss the concerns with their councils, to agree improvements, while also taking leadership in fostering good community rapport with councils, helping them improve their organizational learning.
ESC is also presenting the guidelines to ratepayer groups who are interested to understand their councils’ obligation in community engagement, when they apply for rates variation this year. We are collaborating with ESC to discuss with our ratepayer networks these community engagement guidelines for councils’ 2017-2018 budget planning on 4th March 2017, at the Knox Council Offices, 511 Burwood Hwy, Wantirna South VIC 315. We are also having an earlier session with Local Government Inspectorate that day. Connect with our https://www.facebook.com/ratepayersvictoria/ to keep up to date.
Regional/rural ratepayers groups can come together and contact Ratepayers Victoria (email RatepayersVictoria@outlook.com) to organise a similar workshop with ESC in regional Victoria.
In December 2016, team members were identified and approach to form a project team. They met in early Jan 2017, and preliminary requirement research followed.
The following is a summary of the research highlights (click here for the detailed report) so far:
- Good governance is meant to be a conduct and practice integrated performance management framework for governments and their agencies, including down to the lowest level of municipal councils and their peak bodies.
- It is part of a bigger corporate governance framework, already defined in DTPLI’s Council Governance webpage, comprising of the following sections, categorised and re-organised as follows, for deeper gap analysis.
- A gap analysis of the above corporate governance framework reveals the following:
Good Governance Framework
Operational Control Framework
|1) There are no state-wide community engagementguidelines for councils:||2) Operational control areas have not been structurally designed and aligned to the core operational functions of a council3) State directed service provisioning controls are missing, a major gap when municipal service provisioning is the core business of councils.|
4) Integration of these state corporate governance areas in councils’ frameworks is discretionally translated by each council. This has resulted in the growing prevalence of good governance and operational performance quality issues in and across councils, including varying and often lacking compliance policing intensities and offence handling.
These findings have lead the project team to focus on defining the governance KPI for supporting council decision making and community engagement. The next step is to interview several stakeholders from selected council, state agencies and peak bodies, and MPs who have contributed and/or supported to developing past and present LGPRF versions. Interviewees will be carefully selected to avoid politicized influencers and reputed good governance offenders, to choose people who are committed to improve the LG system and attain its highest governance integrity.
For full details of the findings, click here.